
ICE vs the US Constitution
ICE Under Scrutiny: Whistleblowers Detail Constitutional Violations and Authoritarian Tactics
(This article was generated with AI and it’s based on a AI-generated transcription of a real talk on stage. While we strive for accuracy, we encourage readers to verify important information.)
At Web Summit Vancouver 2026, Ms. Sharon Nadeem moderated a critical discussion with Mr. Ryan Schwank, a former ICE attorney and whistleblower, and Ms. Libby Liu, CEO of Whistleblower Aid. The panel addressed alarming unconstitutional practices within U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and their broader implications for the erosion of democratic principles in the United States.
Mr. Schwank, who resigned from ICE in February after joining in 2021, disclosed that he was instructed to teach officers to enter homes without judicial warrants, a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment, and to keep this instruction secret. He also witnessed widespread training failures, with cadets graduating with insufficient preparation and no proper assessment of their compliance.
He described a significant shift under the current administration towards arbitrary and less transparent enforcement. This included changes in detention policies and the prosecution of individuals for First Amendment-protected speech, such as expressing views on foreign policy. Mr. Schwank noted that ICE, as a key agency for immigration enforcement, was actively pushing constitutional boundaries.
Mr. Schwank’s public testimony contributed to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announcing a return to a longer training program for ICE officers. However, he expressed skepticism about the actual reinstatement of crucial constitutional and use-of-force training, noting the agency’s reluctance to admit prior cuts while claiming to “fix” issues without accountability.
Ms. Libby Liu emphasized the vital role of whistleblowers like Mr. Schwank in an environment where fear and intimidation silence many, and traditional oversight mechanisms are dismantled. She drew parallels to authoritarian regimes, highlighting the efficient centralization of control, the obscuring of truth, and the weaponization of information through technology and media concentration.
Ms. Liu criticized tech companies for their complicity, noting DHS’s use of platforms like Palantir for extensive surveillance and data sharing, which weaponizes information against citizens. She urged tech workers to heed their conscience, consider their values, and come forward if they witness harm, assuring them of Whistleblower Aid’s protection against retaliation.
Mr. Schwank voiced concerns about ICE’s potential deployment to polling stations to suppress votes in future elections, particularly in minority-majority districts, thereby influencing outcomes. He also cautioned non-American citizens, specifically Canadians, against traveling to the U.S. for events like the World Cup, citing risks of detention by improperly trained ICE officers.

